Most of us associate wine with play and relaxation, but for a few hundred scientists around the world, it is what they spend the working day studying, in sometimes headache-inducing detail.
The most cited articles listed by the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, for instance, include “Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Phosphomolybdic-Phosphotungstic Acid Reagents” and “Measurement of Polymeric Pigments in Grape Berry Extracts and Wines Using a Protein Precipitation Assay Combined with Bisulfite Bleaching”. A rather long way from “a glass of red, please” – but all aimed at improving the quality of that red, or white, or rosé.
Every few years I take a look at the preoccupations of the leading international wine research centres, and it is always an illuminating reflection of how the wine world is evolving.
Responding to climate change is a major theme — and not just in the most obvious countries such as Australia, whose wine industry was the first to meet the challenges of hotter summers and water shortages head-on.
Researchers in Rioja, northern Spain, whose grape harvest has traditionally been one of the latest in Europe, have been looking into the effect of pruning dates on what has become an increasing problem for vine growers almost everywhere. Hotter summers mean that sugar levels often inconveniently gallop ahead of the ripening of the all-important phenolics that determine the interesting bits of wine: flavour, colour, tannins and so on. The result is, crudely, that either wines are inconveniently alcoholic (grape sugar being fermented to comprise the alcohol content of a wine) or the grapes, if picked at traditional grape-sugar levels, produce wines with unpleasantly unripe tannins and callow flavours.
The Spanish researchers, in association with corresponding author Wei Zheng (in a sign of our increasingly Chinese-influenced times, the research was partially funded by the China Scholarship Council), found that delaying the annual winter pruning of the vines usefully reduced yield, so there was no need for the expensive process of thinning the crop in summer. It also reduced the risk of spring frost and — hooray — resulted in better wine.
Reading the small print of the 2017 report of the Australian Wine Research Institute reveals that the Australians and New Zealanders have decided to address the problem by the simple expedient of dilution. A year ago their Food Standards Code was amended to allow wine producers to add water to grape juice and must (fermenting grape juice), so long as the potential alcohol level of the resulting wine doesn’t fall below 13.5 per cent. (This sort of “humidification” has been allowed in the US since 2001.)
The official reason is “to reduce the chance of fermentation problems”. Indeed, the AWRI, working closely with the Australian wine industry, faithfully logs every request it receives to advise on a fermentation that comes to a sticky halt halfway through because the yeasts responsible for converting sugar into alcohol are simply overwhelmed. This was particularly common after the hot 2016 vintage, much less so after the cool 2017 season.
Adding water to the fermentation vat is not necessarily evil; it can mean a better-balanced wine. Even the great Ridge Vineyards has been known to do it. But we must hope that Australia’s less quality-minded producers will not take advantage of this new concession.
That same report is telling in how enthusiastically the Australian wine industry is courting China, now its most important customer by value and the world’s fourth-biggest importer of wine. The Australians have been studying which wine attributes appeal to the Chinese palate by evaluating the responses of 300 Chinese consumers to French, Australian and Chinese wines. The favourites were generally high in flavours described as “fermented bean curd”, “hawthorn” or “woody”.
It is interesting to contrast the attitudes to organic wine production and matters green in various countries. Last year I toured the wine faculty at America’s most famous centre of wine academe, the University of California at Davis, outside Sacramento. It seemed to me that the prime focus here was on sustainability. The Jess S Jackson Sustainable Winery Building there, named after the creator of the hugely successful Kendall-Jackson Vintner’s Reserve Chardonnay, is billed as “the first self-sustainable, zero-carbon teaching and research facility in the world”.
California wine production has recently been hit by drought as severe as that currently being experienced in the southern hemisphere — notably South Africa — and in California there has been considerable focus on recycling winery waste. But, to judge from the AWRI report at least, Australians are still very much focused on efficiency, and agrochemical is not a dirty word.
With such a choice of wine-bottle closures nowadays, the number of controlled studies of their relative performance is not surprising. A group of French researchers looked in detail at the effect on shelf life of various alternatives to natural cork. Eighteen months was taken as the effective maximum.
Of particular interest to us mere wine consumers, perhaps, is the 10-year project during which 100,000 entries in the International Wine Challenge in London were monitored to compare the performance of corks and screwcaps. The results, reported in this latest AWRI report, were that the rejection rate for bottles stoppered by a cork (which sort was unspecified) was a rather horrifying 4.7 per cent, whereas that for screwcapped bottles was “only” 1.6 per cent, with about half of these faults being reduction, the cabbagey aroma that can result from a wine that hasn’t been exposed to enough oxygen. The reduction rate of cork-stoppered bottles was apparently exactly the same, 0.81 per cent, even though screwcaps have popularly been associated with reduction.
Buzzwords come and go. While minerality is on the wane, microbes are waxing. It seems they may hold the key to explaining the links between terroir, or place, and the wine it produces. Hail the new gods of wine, microbiologists.
Some notable wine academics past and present who made or make wine.
Was in the oenology faculty at Bordeaux University but now concentrates on cleaning up cellars around the world and making wines such as L’Archange, Ch Haut-Chaigneau and La Sergue in Lalande-de-Pomerol.
Currently researching “wine minerality” at Bordeaux and also makes sweet white Loupiac at Ch Dauphiné-Rondillon.
The international consultant and much-admired instigator of Bordeaux’s new Institut des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin (ISVV) died last year but his legacy lives on in Chx Doisy-Daëne, Reynon, Cantegril, Haura and Clos Floridène, all excellent wines from the south of Bordeaux.
Professor at the Geisenheim wine research institute in Germany and producer of eponymous wine in Mittelrhein.
Was at the AWRI and now makes wine in the Adelaide Hills, originally Nepenthe and now La Linea Tempranillo.
Groundbreaking work on viticulture, especially vine variety detective work, at Davis, but now grows fine reds, particularly Syrah, on Mount Veeder above Napa Valley with viticulturist husband Steve Lagier in the Lagier-Meredith vineyard.
Professor of oenology at Naples University, makes Quintodecimo Campanian wines with his wife Laura.
Professor of oenology at the ancient university of Montpellier, he also makes wine at his family’s Domaine des Chênes in the hills of Roussillon.
Kees Van Leeuwen
Professor of viticulture at Bordeaux’s ISVV, he is also viticulturist at St-Emilion first growth Ch Cheval Blanc.
If you are a subscriber and would like to receive alerts when Jancis’ articles are published, just click the button “add to myFT”, which appears at the top of this page beside the author’s name. Not a subscriber? Follow Jancis on Twitter @JancisRobinson